Ir al contenido principal

Capital Punishment - Jeremy Irons

       In the following video, the actor Jeremy Irons sustains that there are several reasons to be against the death penalty. The first reason that he provides is related to societies that use the death penalty do not have lower crime rates than those that do. When a country abolishes the death penalty, it is not jumped into criminal chaos. The second reason that Irons mentions is that this kind of punishment targets the economically disadvantaged. It refers to people who cannot afford good legal counsel, and without a voice in society, for instance, a saying in the U.S "capital punishment means that those without the capital get the punishment." Statistics show this is true but would it be acceptable if people from all sections of society were executed? Does killing a rich man make killing a poor man right?. The third motive that he refers to is the fact that the death penalty is irreversible and results in the death of innocents. When someone is dead, a retrospective pardon is of little use to them or their family. Since 1990, in China, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and the USA, there have been 51 recorded executions of child offenders. Some as young as 14 years old. But even if no more innocents or children are killed should we tolerate the death penalty?. The last but not least reason is linked with human rights. It abuses two of our most basic human rights: everyone has the right to live, and no one should be subject to torture. The death penalty obviously kills people but it also tortures, physically by the brutal nature of execution and psychologically by forcing individuals to wait to be killed. They wait, sometimes for decades while others are led to their deaths. All in all, these are the justifications that the actor provides to leave clear that this kind of punishment should be abolished. 



Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Portfolio Entry #16 - An Opinion Essay

Reading text : An opinion essay Before reading   Match the definitions (a–f) with the vocabulary (1–6). 1. D       harsh 2. A       a perpetrator 3. E      to deter someone from doing something 4. F       to re-offend 5. C       rehabilitative 6. B       empathy a. someone who has committed a crime or a violent act b. the ability to understand how other people feel c. able to bring someone back to health or a normal life d. strict; severe e. to make someone avoid or stop doing something f. to commit a crime again (not for the first time) Post reading Task 1 Are the sentences true or false? 1. The first paragraph should explain the question in your own words.  TRUE 2. You shouldn’t give your opinion until the conclusion.  FALSE 3. You must always give both sides of the argument.  FALSE 4. Structures like One justifi...

Portfolio Entry #6 : Systemic Functional Linguistics

Systemic functional linguistics ( SFL ) is an approach to linguistics that considers language as a social semiotic system. It was devised by Michael Halliday. Here, there are two interesting videos about this theory .   I hope you find them useful. Video 1: " Basic Principles of Systemic Functional                                   Linguistics" Video 2: " An Introduction to Systemic Functional                                      Linguistics" Blogs visited: https://ceeecy12.blogspot.com/ https://val1cheroni.blogspot.com/ https://camiladigrazia.blogspot.com/ Test yourself and discover how much you know about SFL! Cargando…

Bonus Track - Emma Watson´s Speech about Gender Equality

Have a look at this interesting video about Gender Equality.